‘We Need Our Own AI Models Trained on Local Data’
.jpg "Alexey Ivanov (far right)")
The digitalisation of the economy and the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies pose new challenges for antitrust authorities worldwide. Major players in the AI market, equipped with significant resources, can block new entrants and set anti-competitive prices. Additionally, the use of AI raises increasingly complex ethical questions for which the global community has yet to develop answers. These and other issues were discussed at the Third BRICS+ Digital Competition Forum.
The forum took place in Rio de Janeiro in November on the side-lines of the G20 Summit. It was organised by the International BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre at HSE University (BRICS Antitrust Centre) in collaboration with the FGV Law School and supported by Brazil's competition authority, CADE. The event brought together representatives of UNCTAD, international organisations, antitrust authorities from BRICS countries, as well as world-class researchers and experts from BRICS nations, Mexico, Malaysia, Europe, the UK, and the US.
Artificial intelligence, while now critical to society, is spinning out of control, noted Alexey Ivanov, Director of the BRICS Antitrust Centre at HSE. Large language models and chatbots disregard fundamental principles that should ensure the safety and ethical use of AI. These technologies are already causing harm, particularly to individuals vulnerable to various kinds of manipulation.
‘Ethical principles will not be effective if the industry develops in only one direction. It is crucial for antitrust authorities to act decisively to create space for new start-ups, products, and alternative AI development pathways. If BRICS countries can establish new standards and raise the bar, it will serve as an excellent example for antitrust authorities globally,’ Alexey Ivanov asserted.
Partnerships and investment agreements in AI present a significant challenge for regulators. Companies within the GAMMAN group (Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and NVIDIA) are of particular interest to antitrust agencies. These giants not only develop their own AI products and platforms, but also integrate their technologies into various industries through collaborations with smaller companies and start-ups.
Payal Malik, former Economic Advisor and Head of the Economics Division at the Competition Commission of India, highlighted that such partnerships often involve data sharing and access to computational resources, in addition to financial investments. These alliances may appear as business agreements but, in reality, help the largest companies strengthen their market positions while evading antitrust scrutiny.
‘The key question is whether AI start-ups benefit more from partnerships with large companies or suffer from a lack of resources,’ Ms Malik emphasised.
Introducing new antitrust control criteria is largely ineffective because each deal in the AI and related sectors is unique, explained Elena Rovenskaya, Programme Director at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Consequently, IIASA and the International BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre are developing systemic analysis and mapping methods to create comprehensive models for AI and other dynamic sectors. ‘Breaking down highly complex issues into specific processes and cause-and-effect relationships has already proven valuable in other fields and can be helpful in competition analysis,’ she said.
John Newman, Professor at the University of Miami, cautioned that regulators must proceed carefully when moving toward stricter oversight of AI partnerships and agreements. The first regulator to implement such measures will be under intense scrutiny, and if their actions lack transparency or justification, it could undermine the legitimacy of regulation itself.
Luca Belli, Professor at FGV Law School in Rio de Janeiro (FGV Direito Rio), raised the issue of AI sovereignty for developing nations. He urged BRICS countries to develop their own AI models, citing Brazil's PIX payment system and India's UPI as examples of breaking the VISA and Mastercard duopoly in their respective countries.
Vikas Kathuria, Professor at BML Munjal Law School, agreed, noting that in addition to UPI, India launched the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) to challenge Amazon and Flipkart's duopoly in the local market. ‘India cannot afford bias or discrimination when implementing generative AI in various solutions. We need our own AI models trained on local data,’ he stated.
Irina Filatova, a member of the Russian State Duma Committee on Competition Protection, proposed that BRICS develop joint rules to combat deepfakes. These technologies can enable cybercriminals to obtain users' personal data and access critical information for cybercrimes and blackmailing offenses.
Marcela Mattiuzzo, Professor at INSPER Law School, pointed out that unscrupulous market participants might use AI to create ‘dark patterns’—design features intended to manipulate users, such as making it difficult to unsubscribe from services or leave a platform. These tools, she argued, could be seen as a way to gain competitive advantages.
‘We must define the legal powers regulators need to assess data, documentation, and request key information to understand AI systems, effectively investigate, and ensure proper oversight,’ said Victor Oliveira Fernandes, a commissioner at CADE (Brazil).
André Vellozo, CEO of the US-based data management company DrumWave, stressed the importance of preventing technological giants from dominating the AI sector as they have in digital markets. To achieve this, three critical factors are necessary: consumer awareness, technological innovation, and effective regulation.
CADE Commissioner Gustavo Augusto Freitas de Lima emphasised that AI legislation must become more transparent, flexible, and easy to implement. ‘We should not view AI as a tool solely for major tech companies. AI will be used by society as a whole. It is too late to see ChatGPT as a single product—it represents hundreds and thousands of different applications over which no one will have centralised control,’ he noted.
The forum also included a session of a BRICS working group on competition issues in digital markets.
See also:
‘It Is Hard to Imagine High-Level Interpretation Being Entrusted to a Machine’
In 2024, Russia chairs BRICS, an international organisation comprising nine countries. Throughout the year, dozens of forums, working group meetings, and BRICS sessions took place across various Russian cities. As an interpreter, Ksenia Prosyukova, Associate Professor at the HSE School of Foreign Languages and Candidate of Science (PhD) in Pedagogy, participated in several BRICS events. In an interview, she discussed the personal responsibility of working at high-level events, the challenges and prospects of her profession, and how HSE University trains in-demand translators.
BRICS Representatives Discuss the Development of Statistics in Member Countries
The significance of statistics in today’s digital age has reached a new level. Many decisions at government and business levels are based on data analysis. However, there is a mixed perception of official statistics, which negatively affects trust in public policies. The heads of BRICS statistical agencies discussed this issue and ways to address it at a forum in Kazan, where a representative from HSE University also participated in the event.
‘Geographical Distance No Longer a Problem’: ISSEK Fosters Cooperation with Think Tanks in BRICS Countries
In September, the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge hosted an international working meeting with representatives from Brazilian, Egyptian, and Indian think tanks. The participants discussed opportunities for cooperation, including joint surveys, comparative studies, databases, and publications on foresight, technology, and innovation. It was also decided to draft a multilateral agreement to establish the BRICS Foresight Association.
HSE Experts Take Part in the First International Workshop on Technological Sustainability of BRICS
On September 19–20, Skoltech hosted the First International Workshop on Technological Sustainability of BRICS: University-Industry Partnerships, organised jointly with HSE University Human Capital Multidisciplinary Research Center. The meeting was held as part of the BRICS working group on technology foresight and science and technology studies.
HSE Researchers to Develop BRICS Exchange System Together with Chinese Experts
HSE University International BRICS Competition Law and Policy Centre and the Competition Policy and Assessment Centre founded by the State Administration for Market Regulation of China signed a cooperation agreement. The parties agreed to come up with proposals for the development of exchange trade in goods and raw materials between Russia, China, and the BRICS countries.
‘What Makes BRICS Effective Is Its Diversity’: HSE University Representatives Begin Work at EEF
HSE University Vice Rector Victoria Panova spoke at the Eastern Economic Forum (EEF 2024) that began in Vladivostok. The topic of her speech was the expansion of BRICS.
'Staying Open to New Challenges and Opportunities Is Crucial'
The Tenth BRICS Youth Summit was held in Ulyanovsk from July 22 to 26. The event was attended by more than 200 early-career professionals from Brazil, India, China, Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, South Africa, and Russian regions. Participants gathered to discuss current global issues and explore opportunities for youth collaboration. Students of HSE University who attended the Youth Summit shared their impressions with HSE University Life.
HSE University Launches Consortium of BRICS Law Schools
The HSE Faculty of Law hosted an online meeting with law schools and expert centres from BRICS countries. The purpose of the event was to join efforts to advance legal science and practice for the benefit of the organization. To this end, at the initiative of the Dean of the Faculty of Law Vadim Vinogradov, a Consortium of BRICS Law Schools was established, comprising representatives of leading higher education institutions from a number of countries.
‘At HSE University I Had the Opportunity to Meet the Best Academics’
In April 2024, HSE School of International Regional Studies of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs organised a round table ‘Russia and the Most Influential Countries of the Global South: Comparing Approaches to the New International Political and Economic-Financial Order’. Seyedmohammad Seyedi Asl, Research Fellow at the School of International Regional Studies, spoke to HSE News Service on his report ‘Global South, BRICS, and Iran's Foreign Policy’ presented at the round table, his research interests and impressions of working at HSE University, and living in Moscow.
‘We Work to Create a More Prosperous, Fair, and Safe World’
On July 3–4, 2024, the IX BRICS Civil Forum was held in Moscow for the first time since the association was expanded by five new countries in January 2024. Participants emphasised the importance of personal interaction between public figures, civil activists, as well as the work they do to strengthen and enrich friendly relations between BRICS countries, based on mutual respect. The forum was organised by the BRICS Expert Council–Russia, which is established at the HSE University.