We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Bachelor 2021/2022

Research Seminar "Quantitative Technique in Management Studies"

Area of studies: Management
When: 4 year, 2, 3 module
Mode of studies: offline
Open to: students of one campus
Instructors: Aleksandra Bordunos, Konstantin Nefedov, Louisa Selivanovskikh
Language: English
ECTS credits: 3
Contact hours: 30

Course Syllabus

Abstract

The course covers the main guiding principles of conducting a high quality academic research. By the end of the course, the students will be able to make informed decisions on the research design of their academic papers; understand and adhere to high standards of academic research; understand the importance of theoretical foundation of their research; apply the principles of an effective literature review; recognise the importance of a research framework; understand widely used research methods and data analysis techniques; address data collection and sampling issues as well as bias and validity issues; apply best practices of creating and delivering academic presentations.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • · to make informed decisions on the research design of their academic papers;
  • · to understand and adhere to high standards of academic research;
  • · to understand the importance of theoretical foundation of their research;
  • · to apply the principles of an effective literature review;
  • · to recognize the importance of a research framework;
  • · to understand widely used research methods and data analysis techniques;
  • · to address data collection and sampling issues as well as bias and validity issues;
  • · to understand the main principles of research ethics and the consequences of research misconduct.
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Students should be able to address validity and reliability issues in the collected data; organise and effective data collection process to gather high quality data for the analysis
  • Students should be able to apply recommendations on effective delivery of their academic presentations
  • Students should be able to apply the principles of effective literature review and understand its role and structural differences in different types of academic papers.
  • Students should be able to choose appropriate sample defining techniques, data collection strategy, and data analysis methods.
  • Students should be able to distinguish between different research methods and strategies and understand the ratioanale for their application
  • Students should be able to distinguish between different types of academic papers and their implications.
  • Students should be able to understand the concept of research ethics and possible consequences of fraud and plagiarism
  • Students should be able to understand the importance of research framework and theoretical foundation of the research as a basis of its contribution to the body of knowledge and demonstrate the ability to identify and access high quality research via citation management systems
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • Introduction. Course structure, learning objectives and assessment methods.
  • Research design basics and components
  • Research methods, procedures and techniques
  • Constructs and variables. Data types.
  • Data collection and data analysis. Sampling. External validity.
  • Research findings and research ethics.
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Assignments
    The grade is rounded by means of simple arithmetic rounding.
  • non-blocking Research proposal presentation
    The grade is rounded by means of simple arithmetic rounding.
  • non-blocking Research proposal defence
    The grade is rounded by means of simple arithmetic rounding
  • non-blocking Thesis work-in-progress draft
    The grade is rounded using simple arithmetic rounding.
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2021/2022 3rd module
    FG=0,25*AS+0,25*D1+0,25*D2+0,25*TD AS – Assignments D1 – Research proposal presentation D2 – Research proposal defence TD – Thesis work-in-progress draft Rounding is standard. Example 7.5=8; 7.4=7; 7.6=8. The rounding is used for each assessment element. In-class assignments must be uploaded 2 hours before the start of the seminar. Late submissions of the tasks result in 1 point deduction for every 24 hours of the delay. Cameras must be on during the presentations, otherwise the individual score is reduced by 50%.
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • Creswell, J. W. . V. (DE-588)133331512, (DE-627)543371581, (DE-576)164944168, aut. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research John W. Creswell (Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan), Vicki L. Plano Clark (School of Education, University of Cincinnati).
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research: Pearson New International Edition : Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Vol. Fourth edition, Pearson new international edition). Harlow, Essex: Pearson. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1418055
  • Fallon, M. (2016). Writing up quantitative research in the social and behavioral sciences. Brill.
  • Mark Israel, & Iain Hay. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide to Research Ethics (Vol. 2nd ed). Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=466502
  • Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Creswell, J.W., 2009
  • Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. (2017). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887088
  • Sykes, B., Verma, A., & Hancock, B. (2018). Aligning sampling and case selection in quantitative-qualitative research designs: Establishing generalizability limits in mixed-method studies. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edssch&AN=edssch.oai%3aescholarship.org%2fark%3a%2f13030%2fqt74j5p4dz
  • Willem Mertens, Amedeo Pugliese, & Jan Recker. (2017). Quantitative Data Analysis. Springer. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.b.spr.sprbok.978.3.319.42700.3

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Wahyuni, D. (2012). The Research Design Maze: Understanding Paradigms, Cases, Methods and Methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 69–80. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsu&AN=76405928

Authors

  • BORDUNOS ALEKSANDRA KONSTANTINOVNA
  • NEFEDOV KONSTANTIN SERGEEVICH
  • SELIVANOVSKIKH LUIZA VLADIMIROVNA