Аналитические центры и политическая экспертиза

2022/2023

Статус: Маго-лего

Кто читает: Кафедра публичной политики

Когда читается: 1, 2 модуль

Онлайн-часы: 18

Охват аудитории: для своего кампуса

Преподаватели: Ульданов Артём Александрович

Язык: английский

Кредиты: 5

Контактные часы: 40

Full Syllabus Ask Question

Abstract

This is an optional course that requires prior knowledge in political science and public policy analysis. The course is aimed at providing students with general knowledge about evidence-based policymaking and the roles and places of think tanks in the public policy process, with particular attention to the features of their work, their types, and their strategies in the advisory market. This course will give you theoretical and conceptual knowledge about the use of evidence in policymaking, think tanks, policy advisory practices, and practical insights. Think tanks in the XX century became strong actors not only in the intellectual support of policymakers but also in the policymaking process itself. Their knowledge and expertise might be valuable in very different spheres, and even authoritarian governments do not deny the possibility of using think tanks’ support for better policymaking and the promotion of the most adequate evidence. During the course, we will have a look at different regions and markets where think tanks operate and see how influential and successful they could be in various environments.

Learning Objectives

To show possibilities of the political analysis in defining of political actors, a role and a place of not-governmental actors in political process, in an estimation of their political status and influence
To analyze activity of the main Russian and foreign think tanks their role in policymaking and types of their participation in this process
To understand features and characteritics of policy advisory systems in different regions
To study how think tanks could positively contribute to the quality of policy decisions and development of democratic institutions in a country

Expected Learning Outcomes

Able to structure and define types of analytical centers and their role in political process
Be able to conduct a research on activities of think-tanks with the ability to compare think tanks with each other, based on the clearly defined criteria and their influence on political process in respected countries
Be able to define possible set of resources and strategies of think tanks, types of think tanks, based on their role in political process, types of analytical products of think tanks
Be able to structure and define types of analytical centers and their role in political process
Know definition of think tanks and their basic distinctive features from other institutes of intellectual policy support
Know the general characteristics of a think tank and able to define them
Know the methodological approaches to the analysis of role and place of think tanks in political process, function and forms of their participation in political process

Course Contents

Introduction to the course
Evolution of intellectual support of policymaking: from advisers to expert organizations
Approaches to typology of Think tanks
Think Tanks and global politics
Think tanks, evidence-based policymaking and expertise in policy processes
Determining what is 'evidence' and to what extent policymaking could be based on evidence
Policy advisory systems

Assessment Elements

Reflection paper
Students will be provided with a text to reflect on. The task is to describe the main idea and argument of the paper. Do you agree with the author's conclusion? What are the strong and weak points of the paper, in your opinion? Requirements: 1000-1200 words, Times New Roman 12, 1.5 lining space.
Final essay
A comparative analysis of two think tanks of the same type, but from different countries. 3000 words, Times New Roman 12, 1.5 lining space.
Presentation
The presentation must be an introduction to a student's research paper: explanation of case selection, features of the regions and selected think tanks, etc

Interim Assessment

2022/2023 2nd module
0.5 * Final essay + 0.2 * Presentation + 0.3 * Reflection paper

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

Abelson, D. E. (2018). Do Think Tanks Matter? Third Edition : Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes (Vol. Third edition, revvised and expanded). Montreal: MQUP. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1944843
James G. McGann. (2018). 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.13E9CE4F
Kubilay Yado, A. (2013). Think Tanks : The Brain Trusts of US Foreign Policy. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=618323
McGann, J. G. (2019). Think Tanks : The New Knowledge and Policy Brokers in Asia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press and ADBI. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2040635
Oxford handbook of governance / ed. by David Levi-Faur. (2012). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.362893454
Rich, A. (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=161170
Think tanks and strategic policy-making: the contribution of think tanks to policy advisory systems. (2017). POLICY SCIENCES, 50(1), 105–124. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsnar&AN=edsnar.oai.openaccess.leidenuniv.nl.1887.55212
Think tanks should come out of the shadows. (2019). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.F465758B

Recommended Additional Bibliography

Bergmair, B., Buchegger, T., Hoffelner, J., Schatz, G., Silber, S., & Klinglmayr, J. (2018). Instantly Deployable Expert Knowledge - Networks of Knowledge Engines. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsarx&AN=edsarx.1811.02964
Guzansky, Y. (2017). Foreign policy think tanks and decision making processes. Strategic Assessment, 20(2), 125–135. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsram&AN=edsram.000596158
Hoppe, R. (2008). Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.D041BB
Lavertu, S., & Weimer, D. (2009). Information Costs, Policy Uncertainty, and Political Control: Federal Advisory Committees at the FDA. Conference Papers —— Midwestern Political Science Association, 1. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=poh&AN=45298430
Think tanks in policy making - do they matter? / Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. (2011). Shanghai: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edswao&AN=edswao.38937346X

Authors

Хайнацкая Татьяна Игоревна
ULDANOV ARTEM ALEKSANDROVICH
BELYAEVA NINA YUREVNA

Course Syllabus