Аспирантура
2024/2025
Исследования в области управления технологиями и инновациями
Статус:
Курс по выбору
Направление:
00.00.00. Аспирантура
Формат изучения:
без онлайн-курса
Охват аудитории:
для своего кампуса
Преподаватели:
Текич Аня
Язык:
английский
Кредиты:
3
Контактные часы:
20
Course Syllabus
Abstract
Management of technology and innovation encompasses all the activities necessary for the introduction of new and improved products and services into the market, particularly on the basis of new knowledge and technological development. It is a cross-functional task, affecting all departments of a company: from R&D, over production, to marketing. Technology and innovation management also reaches out to the company’s external environment, to the network of different players – users, customers, suppliers or cooperation partners.
Learning Objectives
- The objectives of the course Research in Technology and Innovation Management are to: (1) introduce students to key concepts and core research in the scholarly field of technology and innovation management, and (2) help them recognize promising research pathways in this field and at its intersection with other fields of research, such as strategic management, international business, marketing, HR and operations management.
Expected Learning Outcomes
- Students will develop skills to discuss potential research directions, research limitations and methodology related concerns with their peers;
- Students will have comprehensive set of knowledge and skills that will enable them to explain and critically discuss the key theoretical concepts related to technology and innovation management;
- Students will improve their skills of clearly presenting and unambiguously communicating their research ideas in English, both orally and in writing;
- Students will improve their skills of conducting literature review and framing their research proposals;
- Students will learn to acquire knowledge and skills independently, creating the basis for the self-directed and autonomous life-long learning.
- Students will learn to identify research gaps in the field of technology and innovation management, as well as at its intersection with other related fields of research;
Course Contents
- Defining innovation
- Open innovation
- Co-creation with individual external contributors
- Intellectual property management
Assessment Elements
- Discussion4 discussion classes (5 points each / 20 points in total); 4 articles per class on different topics (16 articles in total)
- Team presentations4 team presentations (20 points each / 80 points in total); Individual grade is calculated based on peer evaluation.
Bibliography
Recommended Core Bibliography
- Antons, D., Kleer, R., & Salge, T. O. (2016). Mapping the Topic Landscape of JPIM, 1984-2013: In Search of Hidden Structures and Development Trajectories. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 726–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12300
- Brunswicker, S., & Chesbrough, H. (2018). The Adoption of Open Innovation in Large Firms. Research Technology Management, 61(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1399022
- Füller, J. (2010). Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective. California Management Review, 52(2), 98–122. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.52.2.98
- Ghezzi, A., Gabelloni, D., Martini, A., & Natalicchio, A. (2018). Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12135
- Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. 867-878 ; 43 ; Research Policy ; 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
- Zedtwitz, M., Corsi, S., Søberg, P. V., & Frega, R. (2015). A Typology of Reverse Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12181
- Zobel, A. (2017). Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12361
Recommended Additional Bibliography
- Carliss Baldwin, & Eric von Hippel. (2011). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 6, 1399. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
- Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
- Foege, J. N., Lauritzen, G. D., Tietze, F., & Salge, T.-O. (2019). Reconceptualizing the paradox of openness : How solvers navigate sharing-protecting tensions in crowdsourcing. Research Policy 48(6), 1323-1339 (2019). Doi:10.1016/j.Respol.2019.01.013.
- Lauritzen, G. D. (2017). The Role of Innovation Intermediaries in Firm-Innovation Community Collaboration: Navigating the Membership Paradox. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12363
- O’REILLY III, C. A., & TUSHMAN, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
- Ritala, P., & Stefan, I. (2021). A paradox within the paradox of openness: The knowledge leveraging conundrum in open innovation. Industrial Marketing Management ; Volume 93, Page 281-292 ; ISSN 0019-8501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.011