• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
2024/2025

Азиатский треугольник: отношения Японии, Южной Кореи и Китая

Статус: Маго-лего
Когда читается: 2 модуль
Охват аудитории: для всех кампусов НИУ ВШЭ
Язык: английский
Кредиты: 3

Course Syllabus

Abstract

This master's program course “The Asian Triangle: Japan, Republic of Korea and China's relations” explores the intricate and evolving dynamics among Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China, focusing on their international relations during the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The course comprises five lectures and five seminars, each designed to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of historical context, political interactions, economic ties, and cultural exchanges within the Asian Triangle.The lectures will cover key themes such as post-World War II political developments, economic integration and trade relations, security challenges in the region, and the impact of historical grievances on contemporary diplomacy. Special attention will be given to the rise of China's influence and its repercussions for Japan and South Korea, as well as trilateral cooperation and competition in response to global challenges.Using knowledge about the researched region, students will have to make a report at the seminar on one of the topics, as well as actively participate in discussions and debates, which is part of the current control. At the end of the module, students submit an essay in which they demonstrate the skills of systematic thinking and analysis of political and economic events in the region.
Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

  • The objectives of mastering the discipline "The Asian Triangle: Japan, Republic of Korea and China's relations" (module 2) are to acquire knowledge and competencies in the field of the impact of political processes (domestic and foreign) within the studied countries of the Asia-Pacific region on economic interaction from the 90s of the 20th century to the present day, necessary for understanding and analyzing the development strategies and cooperation of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.
  • At the end of the course student must be able to:  Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea’s politics and economy linkage;  Distinguish between different perspectives by drawing on their knowledge of the discipline;  Apply knowledge and understanding of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea relations and behavior to real world situations;  Analyze modern situation in the studied region and understand the possible outcome and strategies;  Demonstrate a wide range of generic skills, including skills in information processing, researching, teamwork, critical and creative thinking, computing independent learning.
  • To master the academic discipline, students must possess the following knowledge and competencies:  Ability to work with information: find, evaluate and use information from various sources, necessary for solving scientific and professional problems (including on the basis of a systematic approach);  Ability to competently build communication, based on the goals and situation of communication;  Ability to systemize previously acquired knowledge and apply it for deeper analysis;  Ability to participate in debated and discussions.
Expected Learning Outcomes

Expected Learning Outcomes

  • Understand the shifts in Japan, South Korea, and China's relations after the Cold War and the formation of new diplomatic alignments. Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of Japanese An RK political strategy and economy and its influence on studied region. Demonstrate a wide range of generic skills, including skills in information processing, researching, teamwork, critical and creative thinking, computing independent learning.
  • Recognize the reciprocal relationship between political decisions and economy. Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of China and Japan politics and economy linkage. Analyze the increasing economic interdependence and competition among Japan, South Korea, and China in the 2000s. Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of Japanese political strategy and economy and its influence on studied region.
  • Explore how security concerns, particularly the North Korean issue and territorial disputes, have shaped Japan-China-South Korea relations. Demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and critical understanding of Japan and South Korea politics and economy linkage. Apply knowledge and understanding of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea relations and their approach to the North Korea factor. Analyze modern situation in the studied region and understand the possible outcome and strategies.
  • Examine how historical grievances and nationalism act as persistent barriers to deepening trilateral relations. Examine how historical grievances and nationalism act as persistent barriers to deepening trilateral relations. Demonstrate a wide range of generic skills, including skills in information processing, researching, teamwork, critical and creative thinking, computing independent learning.
  • Understand the current state of cooperation and competition among Japan, South Korea, and China, focusing on their responses to global geopolitical and economic shifts. Analyze modern situation in the studied region and understand the possible outcome and strategies. Distinguish between different perspectives by drawing on knowledge of the discipline. Analyze modern situation in the studied region and understand the possible outcome and strategies.
Course Contents

Course Contents

  • Lecture 1: Post-Cold War Shifts in the Asian Triangle (1990s)
  • Lecture 2. Economic Integration and Competition in the 2000s
  • Lecture 3. Security Challenges in the Early 21st Century
  • Lecture 4. Historical Memory and Nationalism: Obstacles to Cooperation
  • Lecture 5. Contemporary Trilateral Relations: Cooperation and Competition (2010s–Present)
Assessment Elements

Assessment Elements

  • non-blocking Presentation
    Self-study, which is not included into a course syllabus, but aimed at extending knowledge about the subject, is up to the student’s own initiative. A teacher recommends relevant resources for self-study, defines relevant methods for self-study and demonstrates students’ past experiences. Tasks for self-study and its content can vary depending on individual characteristics of a student. Self-study can be arranged individually or in groups both offline and online depending on the objectives, topics and difficulty degree. Assessment of self-study is made in the framework of teaching load for seminars or tests. In order to show the outcomes of self-study it is recommended:  Make a plan for 1 presentation which will include topic, how the self-study was organized, main conclusions and suggestions and its rationale and importance.  Supply the presentation with illustrations. It should be defined by an actual task of the teacher.
  • non-blocking In-class Participation
    The teacher evaluates the work of students in classes (in-class participation): the completeness and correctness of answers, the results of completing tasks and the activity of students in debates and discussions. The teacher puts the grades for work in practical classes in the worksheet. The accumulated score on a 10-point scale for work in practical classes is determined before the interim or summative assessment - Aauditor.
  • blocking Written Assignments
    In case of the Summative Assessment is not submitted (the arithmetic average is 3 or lower), a positive grade (4 or higher) for the course cannot be given even if the other part of the assessment is successful. I.e., a negative grade for the Summative Assessment is blocking. In this case, the student has the right to retake the failed assessment in form of an oral exam twice. The first retake is accepted by the student's leading teacher, the second-by a commission of three teachers.
Interim Assessment

Interim Assessment

  • 2024/2025 2nd module
    0.25 * In-class Participation + 0.25 * Presentation + 0.5 * Written Assignments
Bibliography

Bibliography

Recommended Core Bibliography

  • 9780191006784 - Flath, David - The Japanese Economy, 3rd ed. - 2014 - Oxford University Press - http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=711347 - nlebk - 711347
  • A. V. Kuznetsov. (2018). Integration Processes in the asia-Pacific Region with the Participation of China and the Position of Russia. Финансы: Теория и Практика, 22(6), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-6-95-105
  • Chang, K., & Lee, C. (2018). North Korea and the East Asian Security order: competing views on what South Korea ought to do. Pacific Review, 31(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1397733
  • China’s rising strategic ambitions in Asia East Asia strategic review editor M.S. Prathibha ; IDSA - Institute for Defence Studies & Analysis. (2018).
  • Complexity, Security and Civil Society in East Asia: Foreign Policies and the Korean Peninsula. (2015). Netherlands, Europe: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsbas&AN=edsbas.8FDC22A4
  • Dent, C. M., & Dosch, J. (2012). The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism and the Global System. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=464196
  • Endicott, J. E., & Heaton, W. R. (2019). The Politics Of East Asia : China, Japan, Korea. LONDON: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=2204348
  • FERDINAND, P. (2016). Westward ho-the China dream and “one belt, one road”: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 92(4), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660
  • Goo, Y.-W., & Lee, S.-H. (2014). Military Alliances and Reality of Regional Integration: Japan, South Korea, the US vs. China, North Korea. Journal of Economic Integration, 329. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsrep&AN=edsrep.a.ris.integr.0631
  • Gries, P. H., Steiger, D., & Wang, T. (2016). Popular Nationalism and China’s Japan Policy: the Diaoyu Islands protests, 2012–2013. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(98), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075714
  • International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno, eds. (2003).
  • Paul De Grauwe, & Zhaoyong Zhang. (2016). The Rise of China and Regional Integration in East Asia. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12107
  • Snyder, S. (2017). South Korea at the Crossroads : Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1650055
  • Wiegand, K. E. (2015). The South Korean–Japanese security relationship and the Dokdo/Takeshima islets dispute. Pacific Review, 28(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1011209
  • Yee, A. (2011). Maritime territorial disputes in East Asia : a comparative analysis of the South China Sea and the East China Sea / Andy Yee.
  • Yeo, A. I. (2017). China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Cooperation: Is It for Real? Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 18(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2017.0022
  • Zhao, S. (2008). China’s Global Search for Energy Security: cooperation and competition in Asia-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary China, 17(55), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560701809460
  • 川島裕. (2003). Japanese Foreign Policy at the Crossroads : Challenges and Options for the Twenty-First Century. Brookings Institution Press.

Recommended Additional Bibliography

  • Deacon, C. (2021). (Re)producing the ‘history problem’: memory, identity and the Japan-South Korea trade dispute. The Pacific Review ; Page 1-32 ; ISSN 0951-2748 1470-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1897652
  • Fravel, M. T. (2005). Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in Territorial Disputes. International Security, 30(2), 46–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228805775124534
  • Grzelczyk, V. (2018). North Korea’s New Diplomacy : Challenging Political Isolation in the 21st Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=edsebk&AN=1231250
  • Lee, I. (2019). Can North Korea Follow China’s Path? A Comparative Study of the Nexus Between National Security and Economic Reforms. Pacific Focus, 34(1), 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12135
  • Michael Yahuda. (2019). The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific : Fourth and Revised Edition: Vol. Fourth and revised edition. Routledge.
  • Robert Hoppens. (2015). The China Problem in Postwar Japan : Japanese National Identity and Sino-Japanese Relations. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Rothman, S. B., Vyas, U., & Sato, Y. (2017). Regional Institutions, Geopolitics and Economics in the Asia-Pacific : Evolving Interests and Strategies. Routledge.
  • Wangping Yang, & Xiaolu Lu. (2018). Study on the Interaction Between China and Japan’s Economy Based on FDI, Import and Export Trade. Studies in Business and Economics, (1), 194. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2018-0015

Authors

  • KOROBOCHKINA Alena VALEREVNA